Question 1

Parliament has absolute power to reverse any Supreme Court judgment by passing a new statute.

Accepted Answer

A legislative override is only constitutionally valid if the new law fundamentally alters the legal basis or cures the specific constitutional defect pointed out by the Court.

Question 2

Tribunals are executive agencies because they are created by parliamentary statutes under Article 323A and 323B, not by the Constitution directly like High Courts.

Accepted Answer

Tribunals exercise judicial and quasi-judicial functions as substitutes for High Courts in specific domains, meaning they must possess the same institutional independence as traditional courts.

Question 3

Consider the following statements regarding the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021 and the Supreme Court's November 2025 judgment: 
1. The Supreme Court struck down the requirement of a minimum age of 50 years for tribunal members. 
2. The Court ruled that Parliament cannot enact a law that overrides a judicial pronouncement under any circumstances. 
3. The judgment mandated the creation of a National Tribunals Commission within four months to oversee appointments and infrastructure. 
How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

(b) Only two — Statement 1 is correct; the 50-year minimum age was struck down as it hindered the appointment of younger talent. Statement 2 is incorrect; Parliament CAN override a judicial pronouncement, provided it cures the constitutional defect or fundamentally alters the legal basis of the judgment (it cannot merely re-enact the struck-down provisions). Statement 3 is correct; the Court gave a 4-month deadline for establishing the National Tribunals Commission.

Question 4

Match the following legal concepts/cases with their corresponding implications in the context of tribunals:

List I (Concept/Case) 
1. L. Chandra Kumar Case (1997) 
2. Madras Bar Association Cases 
3. Article 323A 
4. Article 323B

List II (Implication) 
A. Tribunals for matters other than public services (e.g., taxation, environment) 
B. Repeated litigation establishing that tribunals must have independence akin to High Courts 
C. Administrative tribunals strictly for public service matters 
D. Judicial superintendence of High Courts over tribunals is part of the basic structure

Select the correct matching:

Accepted Answer

(a) 1-D, 2-B, 3-C, 4-A — 1 matches D: L. Chandra Kumar established that High Court jurisdiction under Article 226/227 over tribunals is a basic feature. 2 matches B: The Madras Bar Association has fought a series of cases (2010, 2014, 2015, 2020, 2021, 2025) securing the independence of tribunals from the executive. 3 matches C: Article 323A is specifically for administrative tribunals (public service matters). 4 matches A: Article 323B covers tribunals for other matters like taxation, industrial disputes, etc.

Question 5

Assertion (A): The Supreme Court struck down the provision of the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021 that prescribed a 4-year tenure for tribunal members. 
Reason (R): Short tenures of four years compromise judicial independence by making tribunal members concerned about their post-retirement livelihood, thus increasing susceptibility to executive pressure. 
Select the correct answer:

Accepted Answer

(a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A — Both statements are true. A 4-year tenure (rather than the SC-mandated 5 years) was struck down precisely because short terms reduce job security, forcing members to seek reappointment or post-retirement benefits. This dependence on the executive undermines their ability to impartially adjudicate cases where the government is often a litigating party.

SC Strikes Down Tribunal Reforms Act Provisions

Mercer CFA releases Global Pension Index 2025