PrepDosePrepDose
DailyPrelims CAFree PDF
DailyPrelims CAFree PDF
PrepDosePrepDose

AI-curated current affairs for competitive exams. Your daily dose of exam-ready news.

contact@prepdose.in

Quick Links

  • Today's Dose
  • Prelims 2026 PDF
  • Browse
  • Archive
  • About

Exams Covered

  • UPSC CSE
  • TNPSC
  • UPPSC
  • BPSC
  • MPSC
  • KPSC
  • RPSC
  • WBCS
  • APPSC
  • TSPSC
  • GPSC

Subjects

  • Polity & Governance
  • Economy
  • Environment & Ecology
  • Science & Technology
  • International Relations
  • History & Culture

© 2026 PrepDose. All rights reserved.

Powered by AIMade in India
HomeDictionary

UPSC Dictionary

Did you know?

India's Green Revolution (1960s-70s) made the country self-sufficient in food grain production, led by M.S. Swaminathan and Norman Borlaug.

Generating explanation with verified sources...

HomeDictionary

UPSC Dictionary

Article 16(4A)

Article 16(4A) is a specific provision in the Constitution of India that empowers the State to make laws for reservation in matters of promotion in public employment. It is an enabling provision that allows the State to reserve posts in the services for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) if the State believes they are not adequately represented.

The provision was originally inserted into Article 16 by the Constitution (Seventy-seventh Amendment) Act, 1995, to overcome the Supreme Court's ruling in Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992), which held that reservation under Article 16(4) was limited to initial appointments and could not extend to promotions. The 77th Amendment was enacted to maintain the existing policy of reservation in promotion for SCs and STs, whose representation in services had not reached the required level.

The provision was subsequently amended by the Constitution (Eighty-fifth Amendment) Act, 2001, which added the phrase "with consequential seniority" to Article 16(4A). This amendment ensured that an SC/ST employee promoted through reservation would retain their seniority over general category employees promoted later, with retrospective effect from June 17, 1995. This change was made to negate the "catch-up rule" established by earlier Supreme Court judgments.

The constitutional validity of Article 16(4A) was upheld by the Supreme Court in M. Nagaraj v. Union of India (2006), which ruled that the provision did not violate the basic structure of the Constitution. However, the judgment laid down three conditions for its implementation: the State must collect quantifiable data on the backwardness of the class, the inadequacy of their representation, and ensure that administrative efficiency is maintained. Later, in Jarnail Singh v. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2018), the Supreme Court struck down the requirement for the State to collect quantifiable data on the backwardness of SCs/STs, reaffirming that they are inherently backward, but upheld the application of the creamy layer principle to exclude the advanced sections within these communities from the benefit of promotion reservation. Article 16(4A) is closely connected to Article 16(4), which provides for reservation for any backward class in initial appointments, and Article 16(4B), which allows for the carry-forward of unfilled reserved vacancies without attracting the 50% ceiling on reservation.

References

  • constitutionofindia.net
  • draftbotpro.com
  • ipleaders.in
  • legitquest.com
Back to Dictionary
vajiramandravi.com
  • scobserver.in
  • manupatracademy.com
  • scobserver.in
  • lawbhoomi.com
  • legal-wires.com