AI cooperation: On Artificial Intelligence at a crossroads
The BRICS framework is an alternative to a geopolitical view of AI development
360° Perspective Analysis
Deep-dive into Geography, Polity, Economy, History, Environment & Social dimensions — AI-powered, on-demand
Context
The recent highlighted contrasting approaches to Artificial Intelligence (AI) development between the US-led model, which is heavily funded and driven by geopolitical competition, and the BRICS vision of an open-source, collaborative AI community. India, adopting a middle path, seeks to insulate AI from national rivalries to harness its economic potential while recognizing the inherent security risks and the need for cooperative defensive capabilities, especially for the Global South.
UPSC Perspectives
International Relations
The global AI landscape is increasingly defined by techno-geopolitics, where technological supremacy translates to geopolitical power. The US and China view AI through a competitive lens, treating data, algorithms, and computing infrastructure as strategic assets, leading to the weaponization of technology. This dynamic risks creating a technological divide, where the Global South becomes dependent on or marginalized by 'frontier AI developers'. The (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) grouping presents an alternative paradigm through the proposed . This initiative emphasizes multilateralism in technology, aiming to democratize AI access and prevent monopolistic control by any single nation. India's strategy of 'strategic autonomy' is evident here; it avoids aligning with protests against US models while advocating for collaborative frameworks that protect emerging economies from supply chain disruptions caused by great power rivalry. From a UPSC perspective, this highlights the evolving nature of global alliances, where technology partnerships are as crucial as traditional security pacts.
Science & Technology
The editorial underscores a critical debate in AI development: Proprietary versus Open-Source models. Proprietary frontier models, developed by US tech giants, possess superior capabilities but are controlled by private entities influenced by national policies, potentially restricting access based on geopolitical alignments. Conversely, open-source models, while currently lagging in frontier capabilities, offer a decentralized approach, accelerating global innovation and deployment. For developing nations, participating in the open-source ecosystem is vital for building indigenous AI capabilities tailored to local socio-economic needs, such as agriculture, healthcare, and governance. The push for a collaborative AI community is not just about technology transfer but also about ensuring digital sovereignty, preventing situations where vital technological tools are abruptly withdrawn due to trade disputes or national security mandates of foreign powers.
Internal Security
The rapid advancement of AI introduces unprecedented challenges to Cyber Security and national defense. As AI systems become more autonomous, the risks of 'misalignment' (AI acting contrary to human intent) and their potential to be weaponized for sophisticated cyber-attacks grow exponentially. Developing nations often possess weaker cyber defenses, making them particularly vulnerable to AI-driven threats like automated hacking or disinformation campaigns. The editorial emphasizes that mitigating these risks requires robust defensive capabilities, which can only be achieved through international cooperation and the broad, affordable proliferation of defensive AI technologies. Relying solely on the goodwill of dominant technological powers is insufficient for national security. Therefore, platforms like the are essential for fostering collaboration on AI governance, safety standards, and shared defensive infrastructure to protect against the 'biggest known unknowns' of AI deployment.