China’s claim on Arunachal not supported by international law
Its mixing of sovereignty and historical evidence to support its territorial and maritime claims is in contravention of the decisions of international courts and tribunals
360° Perspective Analysis
Deep-dive into Geography, Polity, Economy, History, Environment & Social dimensions — AI-powered, on-demand
Context
China recently released a standardized list renaming 27 places in Arunachal Pradesh, asserting its claim over the Indian state, which it refers to as 'Zangnan' or South Tibet. This administrative action is part of Beijing's broader strategy to legitimize territorial expansion through a sovereignty-centric interpretation of international law and selective historical narratives.
UPSC Perspectives
Geopolitical
China frequently engages in cartographic aggression (the use of maps and renaming of places to assert unverified territorial claims) to unilaterally alter the status quo. The article notes that China heavily relies on a sovereignty-first approach to international law, selectively referencing the (the Panchsheel agreement of 1954 focusing on mutual respect for territorial integrity). UPSC candidates must understand that China weaponizes this sovereignty principle to reject external interference while pursuing salami slicing (a strategic tactic of using small, stealthy actions to gradually achieve a larger territorial goal) across the and maritime domains like the South China Sea. This dual approach allows China to project a peaceful diplomatic facade while actively expanding its strategic footprint.
Internal Security
The India-China border is divided into three sectors, with Arunachal Pradesh falling squarely in the Eastern Sector. China fundamentally disputes the (the boundary drawn by Sir Henry McMahon during the of 1914), dismissing it as an illegal legacy of British imperialism. By constantly renaming places and issuing localized maps, China aims to build a quasi-legal and administrative narrative to bolster its bargaining position during future border negotiations. India consistently rejects these attempts, emphasizing that Arunachal Pradesh is an integral and inalienable part of India. For UPSC Mains, this highlights the ongoing challenges in border management (securing national frontiers against hostile state and non-state actors) and underscores the necessity of robust infrastructure development in border areas through initiatives like the .
Historical
To legitimize its claims, China frequently exploits specific historical and cultural ties between Tibet and Arunachal Pradesh. Beijing cites the presence of the (the largest Tibetan Buddhist monastery in India and the second largest globally) and the birthplace of the sixth (Tsangyang Gyatso) in Tawang as historical justification for its sovereignty. However, India argues that religious and cultural affiliations do not translate to modern sovereign rights under international law. Aspirants should note how historical revisionism (the systematic reinterpretation of historical records to suit contemporary political agendas) is utilized by the Chinese state to fabricate and sustain territorial disputes. Such dynamics transform cultural heritage sites into sensitive geopolitical flashpoints that require firm diplomatic handling.