Lok Sabha passes Bill enabling Centre to allow UPI charges, MDR on digital payments
The Lok Sabha approved amendments to the Payment and Settlement Systems Act. This change empowers the government to permit charges on digital payment transactions. Currently, UPI transactions remain free for users and merchants. Banks and payment firms seek sustainable revenue models for infrastructure. The government will decide which digital payment methods may attract future charges.
360° Perspective Analysis
Deep-dive into Geography, Polity, Economy, History, Environment & Social dimensions — AI-powered, on-demand
Context
The Lok Sabha has passed the Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026, which removes the legal bar on banks and payment providers charging a Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) on notified electronic payment systems like and . Currently, of the mandates businesses over ₹50 crore turnover to offer these digital payment options without any extra charge to the customer or merchant. The new amendment empowers the central government to notify which digital payment modes may attract charges in the future, shifting towards a 'user pays' model to fund the expanding digital payments infrastructure.
UPSC Perspectives
Economic
The core economic issue here is the funding model for public digital infrastructure. The is the fee a merchant pays to a bank for processing a digital transaction. Previously, the government mandated a zero-MDR regime for and to accelerate financial inclusion and the transition to a less-cash economy. While successful in driving adoption, this model is deemed financially unsustainable by the and , who bear the costs of server maintenance, security upgrades, and dispute resolution. The amendment reflects a shift from a subsidy model (where costs are absorbed by banks or subsidized by the government) to a user-pays model. The Governor highlighted this trade-off: infrastructure costs must be borne either by taxpayers broadly or by the users (merchants) directly. From a UPSC perspective, this touches upon topics like digital public infrastructure (DPI), the sustainability of ecosystems, and the balance between promoting digital adoption and ensuring the viability of payment networks. If MDR is reintroduced, it will likely target high-value commercial transactions to minimize the impact on peer-to-peer () transfers and small vendors.
Polity
The passage of this Bill highlights crucial aspects of the legislative process and delegated legislation. The article notes that the was passed by a voice vote in the without discussion amid opposition protests. This raises persistent governance concerns regarding the declining quality of parliamentary scrutiny and debate on significant economic legislation. Furthermore, the amendment changes the legal framework from a rigid statutory exemption under the to a flexible system where the Central Government will 'notify' which payment modes attract charges. This is an example of delegated (or subordinate) legislation, where Parliament sets the broad framework and delegates the power to make specific rules to the executive branch. While this provides administrative flexibility to adapt to rapid technological changes in the payment sector, it also reduces direct parliamentary oversight over the specific charges levied on citizens and businesses. UPSC frequently asks about the functioning of Parliament and the balance of power between the legislature and the executive.
Governance
From a governance standpoint, this amendment illustrates the challenge of regulating emerging technologies and transitioning from a promotional phase to a sustainable operational phase. The initial zero-MDR policy was a deliberate governance strategy to achieve scale and network effects for , a key pillar of the Digital India initiative. Having achieved massive scale, the government is now addressing the market failure where private entities (, ) are forced to provide a service below cost. Effective governance requires creating a regulatory framework that encourages continuous private investment and innovation in digital payments while protecting consumers from excessive fees. The anticipated strategy of potentially applying only to high-value merchant transactions (while keeping free) demonstrates a nuanced regulatory approach, aiming to cross-subsidize basic services while allowing cost recovery from commercial users. This balancing act between financial inclusion goals and commercial viability is a recurring theme in public policy.